Trump Approves the Controversial Laken Riley Law
The newly signed Laken Riley Act requires detaining unauthorized immigrants accused of crimes like theft or assault. Despite bipartisan support, many Democrats warn it undermines due process, imposes high costs, and won’t solve broader immigration issues.President Donald Trump signed the Laken Riley Act, the first piece of legislation passed in his second term. Named after a 22-year-old Georgia nursing student who was killed while out for a run, the legislation received bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. Trump thanked lawmakers from both sides for their collaboration, with Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., among those attending the White House signing ceremony.
Laken Riley was a student at Augusta University College of Nursing when she went for a run on February 22, 2024, and was confronted by Jose Antonio Ibarra, who killed her during a struggle. Ibarra, of Venezuelan origin, previously arrested for illegal entry near El Paso, TX, in 2022 and released to pursue his immigration case, was later found guilty of murder and other offenses, receiving a life sentence without parole. The case has become a symbol for Republicans who, including Trump, argue that stricter detention policies could have prevented the murder. Under the new law, federal authorities must detain any unauthorized immigrant arrested or charged with crimes such as theft, assaulting a police officer, or causing bodily harm. Supporters say this measure will improve public safety by ensuring individuals accused of serious offenses are not released while awaiting immigration proceedings. The act also grants state attorneys general power to sue the federal government if immigration enforcement failures result in harm to states or individuals, further expanding states’ role in shaping policy. While Republicans hold majorities in Congress, the Laken Riley Act received support from 46 Democrats in the House and 12 in the Senate. Some Democrats from battleground states say they backed the measure because constituents favor stronger border security, and the deportation of immigrants accused of crimes. However, other Democrats criticized the act as an unfunded mandate that could undermine due process. They warn that even minor allegations may lead to detention and possible deportation, potentially harming immigrants with pending legal protections. Critics also point to the bill’s estimated 83 billion price tag over three years, according to a memo from Democrats on the Appropriations Committee. Senator Chris Murphy, D-Conn., labeled it a “totally unfunded mandate,” arguing the act adds costly obligations without addressing broader immigration concerns. Despite these objections, proponents remain firm in their belief that the legislation will prevent future tragedies like Riley’s death. |